Investor demo
Your Bolt or v0 prototype works in the room.
Investors ask what is next and you lack architecture or a migration plan.
From prototype to product in 15 days.
We audit your prototype built with Bolt, v0, Cursor, Lovable, or the vibe coding tool you prefer, define production architecture, and draft a phased migration plan.
Who this is for.
You have a working AI or no-code prototype suited for demos, but it will not survive production.
-
-
No-code that breaks
Your Bubble grew past the original plan.
It became slow, unpredictable, and hard to maintain.
-
Code nobody wants to touch
Cursor or Lovable spun up a fragile codebase.
You do not know how to maintain it or what to salvage when something breaks.
How the 15 days unfold.
Live demos on days 5, 10, and 15. No surprises at the end.
-
Days 1-3
Technical audit
Review current code, dependencies, data model, integrations, and technical debt. Flag what ships as-is, what must be rewritten, and what should be retired.
-
Days 4-9
Production architecture
Target stack, tightened data model, security posture, and scalability pattern. Day 5 demo covers the proposed architecture and rationale.
-
Days 10-13
Migration plan
Phased migration: what moves first, what keeps running during the transition, which risks require mitigation. Day 10 demo with the complete plan.
-
Days 14-15
Technical plan and handoff
Prioritized technical plan, staffing recommendation (internal, external, or hybrid), and implementation roadmap. You leave with hiring and architecture criteria for the next calls.
What you leave with on day 15.
Technical audit
Of the current prototype (what ships, what is cut).
Production architecture
Stack, data model, security, and scalability.
Phased migration plan
What keeps running during the transition.
Prioritized technical plan
With effort estimates.
What this looks like in practice.
Before
The client arrives with a prototype that works, but each new feature feels like it leaves the whole thing more fragile.
After
A defined production architecture, clarity on salvageable slices, and a migration plan without a hard stop.
Outcome
A robust system aligned with the product growth goals.
Questions about this process.
- No. The premise of the process is to identify which parts are worth migrating, which parts are discarded cleanly, and which are kept in production during the transition.
- It depends on team, domain, existing integrations, and cost. By default we evaluate proven options (Next.js, Postgres, Vercel, Netlify, serverless patterns) tied to your case rather than ideology.
- Yes. We evaluate technical feasibility, inference cost at scale, prompt governance, and fallback architecture.
- No. That is backwards: this engagement delivers the lens for deciding who to hire next. You leave knowing whether you need a senior internal lead, external partner, or both.
- The investment varies depending on the complexity and scope of what you want to accomplish in those 15 days. The best way to get a concrete number is to use our quoting tool — it takes 2 minutes and we will get back to you as soon as possible.Get my quote
- If your prototype still lacks traction or users and the real question is whether the product is worth it, it is more suitable that you start with Proof of concept.
Ready to validate before you build?
Book a 30-minute diagnostic call. Free, no commitment.
Or email us at hola@lirroy.com